Servant Leadership Is My Credo By Robert K. Greenleaf

Introduction Servant leadership is my credo. Robert K. Greenleaf defines a servant leader as a â€Å"servant first†-to focus first on the needs of others, especially the team before one considers one’s own needs. I acknowledge others perspectives; give support they need to meet their work and their personal goals by involving them in the decision-making, and building a sense of community. I believe my leadership philosophy leads to higher engagement, and stronger relationships with team members and other people. As a leader, my first duty is to serve those under my command. My task is to make their jobs easier. To support my people, I have to understand their problems and challenges in order to address them. Over the course of my career, I†¦show more content†¦According to Greenleaf â€Å"listening builds strength in another people†. So listening is one of the most important qualities of the authentic leader. The second tenant of my leadership philosophy is Empathy. Whereas many people think leadership is about rank, power, and privilege, I believe that a true leader is that who is willing to place others’ needs above one’s own. My success hinges entirely on the people I work with- the people who committed themselves to join me in my vision and my responsibility to see that they are working at their best capacity. For a successful leading of the organization, authentic leader has to understand and share people’s emotions. For me empathy simply means recognizing the emotions in others and being able to put myself in other person’s situation. This is the ability to understand others person’s attitude and reality. To be empathic leader is not easy as it sounds. Although many people can develop new job skills and knowledge through training and experience, but to interact with other people may be difficult. As a leader I have to think beyond myself, and my ow n concerns. When I look at myself and see beyond my own world, then I realize that there is so much to learn and appreciate. Practically, when I interact with people I learn how to be empathic, I learn to be much more caring and approachable and increase interest in what others feel, think and experience.Show MoreRelatedContemporary Issues in Management Accounting211377 Words   |  846 Pages1989) and Management Accounting: Pathways to Progress (CIMA, 1994), were published during a time of dramatic change in UK management accounting practice. These textbooks contributed to the UK management accounting transformation from the costing clerk credo to strategic management proper. In 1999, he was voted the British Accounting Association Distinguished Academic. His contributions extend outside academe. Bromwich is a past president of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) and

Prohibition and the War on Drugs - 904 Words

Throughout history, campaigns against certain parts of life are frequently argued upon. Wars are in a state of flux, but a constant in Americas policies is the Drug War. The government attempts to prevent the consumption of illicit and harmful substances, even shown in modern domestic policies. Yet with much effort, positive results was not usually yielded. Apart from the outcomes, prohibition has made a large impact on daily life. In the United States, prohibition of alcohol and opium was a visible and controversial debate. The prohibition of alcohol and criminalization of opium were very different but still had some similarities such as the events that happened, its immediate reaction, and the lasting significance.†¦show more content†¦Illicit production spread, despite many efforts for enforcement. To enforce prohibition, the Volstead Act was enacted in 1917 to carry out the 18th Amendment which ratified and became in effect in 1919. The 18th Amendment prohibited the ma nufacture, sale, and distribution of alcohol; however, it did not criminalize consumption. This allowed a black market of alcohol to thrive. There was no measurable gains from prohibition, as it removed much of the tax revenue, created organized crime, and led more people to purchase drugs such as opium as substitutes. All in all, prohibition did not achieve the goal to improve America, but instead added more problems that it was intended to prevent. This led to its repeal in 1933 by the 21st Amendment. Moreover, another dangerous substance that is consumer is opium. Opium is an addictive drug that is taken from a poppy plant. At first, this drug is used as a narcotic in medicine as an anesthetic as the dangers associated with it are outweighed from the medicinal properties. The prohibition of opium originated from foreign disputes. Professor David F. Musto wrote that â€Å"Americans had quickly associated smoking opium with Chinese immigrants who arrive after the Civil W ar to work on railroad construction. This association was of the earliest examples of a powerful theme in American perception ofShow MoreRelated Prohibition Vs War on drugs Essay2724 Words   |  11 PagesAmerica ©Ã‹â€ s war on drugs today is very similar to America ©Ã‹â€ s Prohibition of Alcohol in the 1920 ©Ã‹â€ s. These two major issues of their time may not seem like they can be logically compared, but statistics for usage and a correlating rise in crime for both eras show a strong relationship. There is also a tendency for an outright defiance of the laws and law makers of the United States government in both cases. Most people today think that the prohibition of the 1920 ©Ã‹â€ s and the current war on drugs haveRead MoreEssay about Prohibition vs War on Drugs2770 Words   |  12 PagesAmerica ©Ã‚ˆs war on drugs today is very similar to America ©Ã‚ˆs Prohibition of Alcohol in the 1920 ©Ã‚ˆs. These two major issues of their time may not seem like they can be logically compared, but statistics for usage and a correlating rise in crime for both eras show a strong relationship. There is also a tendency for an outright defiance of the laws and law makers of the United States government in both cases. Most people today think that the prohibition of the 1920 ©Ã‚ˆs and the current war on drugsRead MoreProhibition Of Drugs And Alcohol1492 Words   |  6 PagesPopular belief holds that consumption of drugs and alcohol encourages violence and that the appropriate response is prohibition of these goods. However, a different viewpoint is that prohibition creates illegal underground markets, which require violence and crime to remedy in-house disputes. This paper examines the relationship between prohibition and violence using the historical data and behavior following previous U.S. drug and alcohol laws, regulations, and enforcement on indicators of violenceRead MoreThe Rise Of Drug Prohibition975 Words   |  4 PagesDrug prohibition is rarely viewed negatively by many Americans. The failure of drug prohibition has sparked some debate in the last fifty years, however, the ignorance about illegal substances has led to little discussion on alternatives to prohibition. Legalizing all drugs would be a better alternative than perpetuating the failed war on drugs. The dru g war has negatively impacted many lives by demonizing users and corrupting public officials. Criminalizing alcohol did not work in the 1920s andRead MoreThe War On Drugs And Its Effects On Society1564 Words   |  7 Pages The War on Drugs is a deep-rooted controversial campaign of prohibition and military aid that has been disputed for many years. There are constant debates as to whether there will ever be a viable solution to the problem. However, as we continue to pursue the â€Å"war on drugs,† it has become increasingly evident that â€Å"winning† the war seems to be an impossible task. Drug prohibition and the undertaking of the war on drugs have stirred much controversy over its moral and logical implications. WhileRead MoreLaw Enforcement : The United States Essay1595 Words   |  7 Pagesharming other people (Christ). This was the model that we based our western law enforcement agencies on, until prohibition became a federal task in the 1920’s. T his is when the federal government decided to take up the task of protecting people from themselves. Fast forward to the 1960’s; President Richard Nixon took a step forward with prohibition by declaring a war on drugs. This perpetual war has consumed much of our country’s financial resources and profoundly affected our criminal justice systemRead More The War on Drugs is Failing Essay1228 Words   |  5 PagesThe War on Drugs is Failing â€Å"Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance†¦ for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man’s appetite by legislation and make a crime out of things that are not a crime. A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principle upon which our government was founded† Abraham Lincoln On January 16, 1920 the Eighteenth Amendment was ratified by thirty-six states and became part of the Constitution. The intentionRead MoreMarijuana must Be Legalized941 Words   |  4 PagesWhen you think of prohibition, one typically thinks of the roaring twenties. This was when the government prohibited the sale of alcohol. Looking back through history, we see trends from then happening today with the prohibition of marijuana and other drugs. Many people have many opinions if marijuana should be legalized or not. It’s not as easy as just looking at the pros and cons. Our government needs to determine if the prohibition of drugs is actually promoting greater health, safety, andRead MoreEssay Why All Drugs Should Be Legalized 1468 Words   |  6 Pages Abraham Lincoln once said: â€Å"Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a mans appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded.†(Lincoln) When most people think of prohibition, they think of the 18th amendment of the constitution; the alcoholRead MoreEssay on The War On Drugs1079 Words   |  5 PagesIn recent years the so-called â€Å"war on drugs† has taken over the streets and back alleys of suburban America. It has caused a problem that mirrors the prohibition days of the 1920’s and early 30’s. Politicians trying to play â€Å"tough guy,† are only contributing to more violence. Their laws have created an underground drug-trade, in which modern drug-dealers have taken the place of th e bootleggers of old. The real question is whether or not this â€Å"war† is working. Most people would like to believe that

Issues Relating Determination Of Claiming â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Issues Relating Determination Of Claiming? Answer: Introducation From the given scenario it is found that a cost has been incurred for moving the machinery to the new site. An assertion can be put forward in this context that deductions are prohibited within the framework of section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 With the objective of depreciation, shifting the machinery to the new site results in an increase price of the asset (Pyrmont 2014). With reference to the Section 8-1 of the ITAA it can be said that cost that is incurred from moving the machine to the new site represents a small change (Tan, Braithwaite and Reinhart 2016). The main cause of taking into the account the expense as the allowable deductions due to the reason that cost constitute the portion of business expenditure originated from the daily business transactions. As defined in British Insulated Helsby Cables the cost that is incurred at the accounting of transpiration symbolizes an unremitting benefit of the business premises by moving the depreciable asset (Grange et al. 2014). As stated in the Taxation ruling TD 93/126 upon the installation of machinery and on the commencement of commercial operations, cost involved in moving the machine to the new site forms the part of revenue (Cao et al. 2015). It is worth mentioning that cost occurred in locating machine to new site stands as the cost of capital and will constitute non-allowable deductions. It can be concluded that cost that is occurred in locating the machine to the new site constitute locating of asset to the new site will be regarded as capital expenditure. With reference to the present scenario it can be said that no kind of permissible deductions will be allowed in this context. The present scenario is based on the determination of the revaluation of the assets to effect the insurance coverage. This issue raises the question whether or not such expenses would be treated as allowable deductions in section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. From the current questions the scenario raises that incurrence of cost from the revaluation of assets to effect cover of insurance constitute permissible deductions that is allowable as deductions under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 as the expense is recurring in nature (James 2015). From the current study, it can be stated that the expense has direct relation with the fixed asset (Woellner et al. 2016). Therefore, at the time of determining deductibility of the expenses it is vital to ascertain that whether the expense that has occurred in revaluation is obtained from the increase in the revenue generation ability or it is just incurred in safeguarding the asset. If the later leads to an advantage of temporary in nature or possess the character of recurring than that will be regarded as allowable deductions under Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. On arriving at the conclusion, it can be said that cost derived from the insurance cover constitutes a permissible deductions because the cost is repetitive and under Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1977 will be allowed as permissible deductions. The introductory statement familiarises with the issue pertaining to the determination of deductible nature of the legal spending incurred by the individual tax payer with the objective of opposing the petition of the winding up of business. The scenario introduces the question that the cost that is occurred at the time of winding up business are usually occurred during the business operations and they will not be treated in the form of allowable deductions in reference to Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The Taxation Ruling of ID 2004/367 defines that legal cost incurred from the business operations constitute as an allowable deduction (Jover 2014). This is because such expenses are incurred by the individual tax payer should be from carrying out of the business operations from which the taxpayer produces an assessable income. Noting down the judgement of federal court in the case of Snowden and Wilson Pty Ltd (1958) v FC of T spendings occupying the nature of infrequent and the individual taxpayer under no kind of previous occasion was necessarily under obligations of incurring legal actions (Kenny, 2013). Since under not any situation it forbids the outlay to from being measured as admissible income tax deductions. Even though the legal expense is meeting, the criteria of the positive limbs would under no circumstance be permitted as allowable business deductions (Krever 2013). The reason for not considering the expenditure for allowable business expense is that they are regarded in the nature of the capital expense (Anderson, Dickfos and Brown 2016). The incurrence of legal expense that is incurred at the time of winding up the petition shall not be considered as the allowable deductions because they represents the features of capital. The above defined problem statement can be concluded by stating that the legal expense that has resulted from opposing the petition would be treated for non-permissible business deductions. The spending is capital expenditure and does meet the eligibility criteria of section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The issue brings forward the query that legal expenses incurred by the taxpayer concerning the service of solicitor for several business functions of the clientele constitute deductions that are permitted under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The above stated issue brings forward the question that whether an individual taxpayer incurring legal expenses in regard to the business operations will be accounted as the allowable deductions under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 (Tran-Nam and Walpole 2016). Nevertheless, there prevail few kinds of exceptions relating to the legal expenditure that is occurred by the taxpayer from the service of the solicitor. If the expenses are in the nature of capital, private or domestic and incurred in gaining an exempted and non-assessable income then it will not be considered as the allowable deductions. From the above stated explanation, for a taxpayer occurrence of legal expenditure that does not forms the part of the business income or not associated with the process of carrying on of a business activities then it will not be allowed as allowable deductions (Morgan, Mortimer and Pinto 2013). As it can be said that legal expenditure that is occurred by the taxpayer in the present context will be allowed as deductions (Snape and De Souza 2016). The primary reason for accounting the legal spending for allowable income tax deductions is because they are regarded as the part of the business and meets the deductions criteria of Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The problem statement can be concluded by defining the legal expense inuccred by the taxpayer in this context is for gaining the business income and they are daily business expense. This expense meets the criteria of Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 for being regarded as allowable business deductions for income tax purpose. The issue raises the question regarding the determination of the input tax credit regarding the incurrence of advertisement expenses occurred under the GSTR Act 1999. The Goods and Service Taxation Ruling of GSTR 2006/3 lay down the guidelines concerning the procedures which can be applied arrive at the input tax credit and the administration of change that is put into the use by the financial supplies as per the new taxation system of GST Act 1999 (James 2016). An important contemplation to be noted in this context is that degree of creditable purpose and authentic employment of the ruling under division 11-15 and 129 of the GST Act 1999. The discussed GST Ruling is generally applicable for all the assessable entities that is registered or mandatorily necessary to get registered so that it can acquire the financial supplies which is beyond the prescribed limit of the financial acquisition and falls under the input tax credit or lowered input tax credit (Nethercott et al. 2016). The case of Big Bank evidently puts forward that the bank had a spending of $1,650,000, which additionally included the amount of the GST relating the advertisement that has been made, by the bank. The Goods and Service taxation ruling of GSTR 2006/3 is applied in the present situation of Big Bank Ltd as because the company shall be considered to be eligible for the input tax credit or lower input tax credits (Russell 2016). In agreement with the taxation rulings if it is found that the company is registered or it is required to obtain registration, GST will be payable in relation to the assessable supplies made. The system of GST lay down that the a taxable entity or the person can bring forward the claim of the input tax credit the supplies that are inclusive of GST that is obtained in the process of importation by the entity (Sadiq 2016). If an entity makes financial supplies and surpasses the threshold limit of the financial acquisition, such taxable entities will not be allowed to recover all the amount of GST that is charged to them but a portion of such GST can be recovered by the company (Kenny 2013). As it has been stated in the case of Ronpibon Tin NL v FC of T the principle of extent and to the extent is used to analyse the law of GST. This consists of the obligations in which the methodology of the allocation adopted should be fair and reasonable in relation to the specific enterprise (Krever 2013). Taking in the account the contemplation that is made in para 11-5 and 15-5 of the GSTR 2006/3 in order to make an acquisition entitled as creditable acquisition it should be noted that the financial supplies must be creditable solely or in fragments. Moreover there is additional compulsory necessities of para 11-5 and 15-5 that helps in determining an acquisition as the entitled creditable import, the acquisition is ought to be absolutely in the direction of creditable purpose (Woellner 2013). If it is found that the acquisition is partly for creditable reason than it is obligatory to establish the degree of creditable function. As it has been defined under the Section 11-15 or 15-10 an acquisition shall be eligible as creditable if the taxable entities claims input tax credits for the financial supplies made by it (Morgan, Mortimer and Pinto 2013). Big bank in context of present situation incurred an advertisement spending that was entirely dedicated for the creditable purpose. Big Bank has also surpassed the financial acquisition threshold limit and the bank in the present context can be regarded for the entailment of claiming input tax credit in conformity with the GSTR 2006/3 (Milton 2013). Conclusion: As apparent from the overhead conversation, the problem statement can be concluded by stating that Big Bank Ltd will be taken into the considerations for the entitlement of claiming input tax credit. Such input tax credit can be claimed in accordance with the GSTR 2006/13 for the sum that is incurred by Big Bank Ltd relating to the advertisement outlay sustained on creditable acquisition. Reference List: Grange, J., Jover-Ledesma, G. and Maydew, G. (n.d.).2014 principles of business taxation. James, M. (n.d.). 2015Taxation of small businesses. Jover-Ledesma, G. (2014).Principles of business taxation 2015. [Place of publication not identified]: Cch Incorporated. Kenny, P. (2013).Australian tax 2013. Chatswood, N.S.W.: LexisNexis Butterworths. Krever, R. (2013).Australian taxation law cases 2013. Pyrmont, N.S.W.: Thomson Reuters. Milton, Qld 2013. The taxpayers' guide. Wrightbooks. Morgan, A., Mortimer, C. and Pinto, D. (2013).A practical introduction to Australian taxation law. North Ryde [N.S.W.]: CCH Australia. Nethercott, L., Devos, K., Gonzaga, L. and Richardson, G. (2016).Australian taxation study manual. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Pyrmont, (2014). Australian Taxation Law Cases 2014. NSW: Thomson Reuters. ROBIN, H., 2017.AUSTRALIAN TAXATION LAW 2017. OXFORD University Press. Russell, T., 2016. Trust beneficiaries and exemptions from CGT: Reflections on the Oswal litigation.Taxation in Australia,51(6), p.296. Sadiq, K. (2016).Principles of Taxation Law 2016. Pyrmont: Law Book Co of Australasia. Snape, J. and De Souza, J., 2016.Environmental taxation law: policy, contexts and practice. Routledge. Tan, L.M., Braithwaite, V. and Reinhart, M., 2016. Why do small business taxpayers stay with their practitioners? Trust, competence and aggressive advice.International Small Business Journal,34(3), pp.329-344. The taxpayers' guide 2013 2014. (2013). Milton, Qld.: Wrightbooks. Tran-Nam, B. and Walpole, M., 2016. Tax disputes, litigation costs and access to tax justice.eJournal of Tax Research,14(2), p.319. Woellner, R. (2013).Australian taxation law select 2013. North Ryde, N.S.W.: CCH Australia. Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C. and Pinto, D., 2016. Australian Taxation Law 2016.OUP Catalogue.

The Nanny Murder Case Essays - Louise Woodward Case, Woodward

The Nanny Murder Case Massachusetts v. Woodward Louise Woodward, a British Nanny, was hired in November of 1996 by Sunil and Deborah Eappen, for their sons, Matthew and Brendan. On February 4, 1997, the Massachusetts police received a phone call from Woodward stating that Matthew Eappen was having trouble breathing. When the paramedics examined Matthew, they said he had a 2-? inch skull fracture. His eyes were bulging, which is a sign of the ?shaken baby syndrome.? Before Matthew Eappens death, he spent four days on life support. After the event, Woodward was jailed without bond. Supporters from Massachusetts and Britain argued that she should not have to stay in jail on grounds that she is a foreigner and did not understand the U.S. legal system. She was kept in a states women's prison and had to stay because prosecutors felt that she might flee the country if she was freed on bail. Prosecutors said that Woodward admitted to harming Matthew. They said she shook him, dropped him on the floor, and then tossed him on the bed in order to quiet the baby. Prosecutors argued that Woodward was so frustrated with Matthews uncontrollable crying, that she began to violently shake him to stop the crying. Medical examiners said that Matthew must have hit the floor with the ?force equivalent to a fall from a second-story window.? Naturally the injuries from the fall along with the shaking caused Matthews death. Forensic expert, Barry Scheck, who took part in the O.J. Simpson trial, was recruited to help Woodward's defensive argument. The defense stated that a pre-existing medical condition might have killed Matthew, not the supposed mistreatment. The defense attempted to find genetic disorders that could have affected his bone strength and development or could have caused brain hemorrhages, by requesting DNA tests on Matthew. The defense also tried to put the blame on Matthews's two-year-old brother, Brendan, for the injuries, since he was the only other family member home that night. Prosecutors immediately argued that a boy of such a young age isn't capable of inflicting that serious of physical trauma on an infant. Louise Woodward was sentenced to death. After many appeals, and different attorneys, her defense argued that during the original trial, the defense was unable to have full access to the medical evidence that the state collected. Woodward was eventually acquitted and returned home to Britain. My personal opinion of the trial and the outcome is negative. I find that Louise Woodward not being imprisoned for her crime is ridiculous. It is obvious that she is responsible for Matthew Eappens death and Woodward's acquittal is absurd. If she can get away with such a horrible crime and be free to walk the streets, then I am sure there are people accused of equally severe crimes who have also been acquitted. Bibliography www.courttv.com Social Issues