Servant Leadership Is My Credo By Robert K. Greenleaf

Introduction Servant leadership is my credo. Robert K. Greenleaf defines a servant leader as a â€Å"servant first†-to focus first on the needs of others, especially the team before one considers one’s own needs. I acknowledge others perspectives; give support they need to meet their work and their personal goals by involving them in the decision-making, and building a sense of community. I believe my leadership philosophy leads to higher engagement, and stronger relationships with team members and other people. As a leader, my first duty is to serve those under my command. My task is to make their jobs easier. To support my people, I have to understand their problems and challenges in order to address them. Over the course of my career, I†¦show more content†¦According to Greenleaf â€Å"listening builds strength in another people†. So listening is one of the most important qualities of the authentic leader. The second tenant of my leadership philosophy is Empathy. Whereas many people think leadership is about rank, power, and privilege, I believe that a true leader is that who is willing to place others’ needs above one’s own. My success hinges entirely on the people I work with- the people who committed themselves to join me in my vision and my responsibility to see that they are working at their best capacity. For a successful leading of the organization, authentic leader has to understand and share people’s emotions. For me empathy simply means recognizing the emotions in others and being able to put myself in other person’s situation. This is the ability to understand others person’s attitude and reality. To be empathic leader is not easy as it sounds. Although many people can develop new job skills and knowledge through training and experience, but to interact with other people may be difficult. As a leader I have to think beyond myself, and my ow n concerns. When I look at myself and see beyond my own world, then I realize that there is so much to learn and appreciate. Practically, when I interact with people I learn how to be empathic, I learn to be much more caring and approachable and increase interest in what others feel, think and experience.Show MoreRelatedContemporary Issues in Management Accounting211377 Words   |  846 Pages1989) and Management Accounting: Pathways to Progress (CIMA, 1994), were published during a time of dramatic change in UK management accounting practice. These textbooks contributed to the UK management accounting transformation from the costing clerk credo to strategic management proper. In 1999, he was voted the British Accounting Association Distinguished Academic. His contributions extend outside academe. Bromwich is a past president of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) and

Prohibition and the War on Drugs - 904 Words

Throughout history, campaigns against certain parts of life are frequently argued upon. Wars are in a state of flux, but a constant in Americas policies is the Drug War. The government attempts to prevent the consumption of illicit and harmful substances, even shown in modern domestic policies. Yet with much effort, positive results was not usually yielded. Apart from the outcomes, prohibition has made a large impact on daily life. In the United States, prohibition of alcohol and opium was a visible and controversial debate. The prohibition of alcohol and criminalization of opium were very different but still had some similarities such as the events that happened, its immediate reaction, and the lasting significance.†¦show more content†¦Illicit production spread, despite many efforts for enforcement. To enforce prohibition, the Volstead Act was enacted in 1917 to carry out the 18th Amendment which ratified and became in effect in 1919. The 18th Amendment prohibited the ma nufacture, sale, and distribution of alcohol; however, it did not criminalize consumption. This allowed a black market of alcohol to thrive. There was no measurable gains from prohibition, as it removed much of the tax revenue, created organized crime, and led more people to purchase drugs such as opium as substitutes. All in all, prohibition did not achieve the goal to improve America, but instead added more problems that it was intended to prevent. This led to its repeal in 1933 by the 21st Amendment. Moreover, another dangerous substance that is consumer is opium. Opium is an addictive drug that is taken from a poppy plant. At first, this drug is used as a narcotic in medicine as an anesthetic as the dangers associated with it are outweighed from the medicinal properties. The prohibition of opium originated from foreign disputes. Professor David F. Musto wrote that â€Å"Americans had quickly associated smoking opium with Chinese immigrants who arrive after the Civil W ar to work on railroad construction. This association was of the earliest examples of a powerful theme in American perception ofShow MoreRelated Prohibition Vs War on drugs Essay2724 Words   |  11 PagesAmerica ©Ã‹â€ s war on drugs today is very similar to America ©Ã‹â€ s Prohibition of Alcohol in the 1920 ©Ã‹â€ s. These two major issues of their time may not seem like they can be logically compared, but statistics for usage and a correlating rise in crime for both eras show a strong relationship. There is also a tendency for an outright defiance of the laws and law makers of the United States government in both cases. Most people today think that the prohibition of the 1920 ©Ã‹â€ s and the current war on drugs haveRead MoreEssay about Prohibition vs War on Drugs2770 Words   |  12 PagesAmerica ©Ã‚ˆs war on drugs today is very similar to America ©Ã‚ˆs Prohibition of Alcohol in the 1920 ©Ã‚ˆs. These two major issues of their time may not seem like they can be logically compared, but statistics for usage and a correlating rise in crime for both eras show a strong relationship. There is also a tendency for an outright defiance of the laws and law makers of the United States government in both cases. Most people today think that the prohibition of the 1920 ©Ã‚ˆs and the current war on drugsRead MoreProhibition Of Drugs And Alcohol1492 Words   |  6 PagesPopular belief holds that consumption of drugs and alcohol encourages violence and that the appropriate response is prohibition of these goods. However, a different viewpoint is that prohibition creates illegal underground markets, which require violence and crime to remedy in-house disputes. This paper examines the relationship between prohibition and violence using the historical data and behavior following previous U.S. drug and alcohol laws, regulations, and enforcement on indicators of violenceRead MoreThe Rise Of Drug Prohibition975 Words   |  4 PagesDrug prohibition is rarely viewed negatively by many Americans. The failure of drug prohibition has sparked some debate in the last fifty years, however, the ignorance about illegal substances has led to little discussion on alternatives to prohibition. Legalizing all drugs would be a better alternative than perpetuating the failed war on drugs. The dru g war has negatively impacted many lives by demonizing users and corrupting public officials. Criminalizing alcohol did not work in the 1920s andRead MoreThe War On Drugs And Its Effects On Society1564 Words   |  7 Pages The War on Drugs is a deep-rooted controversial campaign of prohibition and military aid that has been disputed for many years. There are constant debates as to whether there will ever be a viable solution to the problem. However, as we continue to pursue the â€Å"war on drugs,† it has become increasingly evident that â€Å"winning† the war seems to be an impossible task. Drug prohibition and the undertaking of the war on drugs have stirred much controversy over its moral and logical implications. WhileRead MoreLaw Enforcement : The United States Essay1595 Words   |  7 Pagesharming other people (Christ). This was the model that we based our western law enforcement agencies on, until prohibition became a federal task in the 1920’s. T his is when the federal government decided to take up the task of protecting people from themselves. Fast forward to the 1960’s; President Richard Nixon took a step forward with prohibition by declaring a war on drugs. This perpetual war has consumed much of our country’s financial resources and profoundly affected our criminal justice systemRead More The War on Drugs is Failing Essay1228 Words   |  5 PagesThe War on Drugs is Failing â€Å"Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance†¦ for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man’s appetite by legislation and make a crime out of things that are not a crime. A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principle upon which our government was founded† Abraham Lincoln On January 16, 1920 the Eighteenth Amendment was ratified by thirty-six states and became part of the Constitution. The intentionRead MoreMarijuana must Be Legalized941 Words   |  4 PagesWhen you think of prohibition, one typically thinks of the roaring twenties. This was when the government prohibited the sale of alcohol. Looking back through history, we see trends from then happening today with the prohibition of marijuana and other drugs. Many people have many opinions if marijuana should be legalized or not. It’s not as easy as just looking at the pros and cons. Our government needs to determine if the prohibition of drugs is actually promoting greater health, safety, andRead MoreEssay Why All Drugs Should Be Legalized 1468 Words   |  6 Pages Abraham Lincoln once said: â€Å"Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a mans appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded.†(Lincoln) When most people think of prohibition, they think of the 18th amendment of the constitution; the alcoholRead MoreEssay on The War On Drugs1079 Words   |  5 PagesIn recent years the so-called â€Å"war on drugs† has taken over the streets and back alleys of suburban America. It has caused a problem that mirrors the prohibition days of the 1920’s and early 30’s. Politicians trying to play â€Å"tough guy,† are only contributing to more violence. Their laws have created an underground drug-trade, in which modern drug-dealers have taken the place of th e bootleggers of old. The real question is whether or not this â€Å"war† is working. Most people would like to believe that

Issues Relating Determination Of Claiming â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Issues Relating Determination Of Claiming? Answer: Introducation From the given scenario it is found that a cost has been incurred for moving the machinery to the new site. An assertion can be put forward in this context that deductions are prohibited within the framework of section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 With the objective of depreciation, shifting the machinery to the new site results in an increase price of the asset (Pyrmont 2014). With reference to the Section 8-1 of the ITAA it can be said that cost that is incurred from moving the machine to the new site represents a small change (Tan, Braithwaite and Reinhart 2016). The main cause of taking into the account the expense as the allowable deductions due to the reason that cost constitute the portion of business expenditure originated from the daily business transactions. As defined in British Insulated Helsby Cables the cost that is incurred at the accounting of transpiration symbolizes an unremitting benefit of the business premises by moving the depreciable asset (Grange et al. 2014). As stated in the Taxation ruling TD 93/126 upon the installation of machinery and on the commencement of commercial operations, cost involved in moving the machine to the new site forms the part of revenue (Cao et al. 2015). It is worth mentioning that cost occurred in locating machine to new site stands as the cost of capital and will constitute non-allowable deductions. It can be concluded that cost that is occurred in locating the machine to the new site constitute locating of asset to the new site will be regarded as capital expenditure. With reference to the present scenario it can be said that no kind of permissible deductions will be allowed in this context. The present scenario is based on the determination of the revaluation of the assets to effect the insurance coverage. This issue raises the question whether or not such expenses would be treated as allowable deductions in section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. From the current questions the scenario raises that incurrence of cost from the revaluation of assets to effect cover of insurance constitute permissible deductions that is allowable as deductions under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 as the expense is recurring in nature (James 2015). From the current study, it can be stated that the expense has direct relation with the fixed asset (Woellner et al. 2016). Therefore, at the time of determining deductibility of the expenses it is vital to ascertain that whether the expense that has occurred in revaluation is obtained from the increase in the revenue generation ability or it is just incurred in safeguarding the asset. If the later leads to an advantage of temporary in nature or possess the character of recurring than that will be regarded as allowable deductions under Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. On arriving at the conclusion, it can be said that cost derived from the insurance cover constitutes a permissible deductions because the cost is repetitive and under Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1977 will be allowed as permissible deductions. The introductory statement familiarises with the issue pertaining to the determination of deductible nature of the legal spending incurred by the individual tax payer with the objective of opposing the petition of the winding up of business. The scenario introduces the question that the cost that is occurred at the time of winding up business are usually occurred during the business operations and they will not be treated in the form of allowable deductions in reference to Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The Taxation Ruling of ID 2004/367 defines that legal cost incurred from the business operations constitute as an allowable deduction (Jover 2014). This is because such expenses are incurred by the individual tax payer should be from carrying out of the business operations from which the taxpayer produces an assessable income. Noting down the judgement of federal court in the case of Snowden and Wilson Pty Ltd (1958) v FC of T spendings occupying the nature of infrequent and the individual taxpayer under no kind of previous occasion was necessarily under obligations of incurring legal actions (Kenny, 2013). Since under not any situation it forbids the outlay to from being measured as admissible income tax deductions. Even though the legal expense is meeting, the criteria of the positive limbs would under no circumstance be permitted as allowable business deductions (Krever 2013). The reason for not considering the expenditure for allowable business expense is that they are regarded in the nature of the capital expense (Anderson, Dickfos and Brown 2016). The incurrence of legal expense that is incurred at the time of winding up the petition shall not be considered as the allowable deductions because they represents the features of capital. The above defined problem statement can be concluded by stating that the legal expense that has resulted from opposing the petition would be treated for non-permissible business deductions. The spending is capital expenditure and does meet the eligibility criteria of section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The issue brings forward the query that legal expenses incurred by the taxpayer concerning the service of solicitor for several business functions of the clientele constitute deductions that are permitted under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The above stated issue brings forward the question that whether an individual taxpayer incurring legal expenses in regard to the business operations will be accounted as the allowable deductions under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 (Tran-Nam and Walpole 2016). Nevertheless, there prevail few kinds of exceptions relating to the legal expenditure that is occurred by the taxpayer from the service of the solicitor. If the expenses are in the nature of capital, private or domestic and incurred in gaining an exempted and non-assessable income then it will not be considered as the allowable deductions. From the above stated explanation, for a taxpayer occurrence of legal expenditure that does not forms the part of the business income or not associated with the process of carrying on of a business activities then it will not be allowed as allowable deductions (Morgan, Mortimer and Pinto 2013). As it can be said that legal expenditure that is occurred by the taxpayer in the present context will be allowed as deductions (Snape and De Souza 2016). The primary reason for accounting the legal spending for allowable income tax deductions is because they are regarded as the part of the business and meets the deductions criteria of Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997. The problem statement can be concluded by defining the legal expense inuccred by the taxpayer in this context is for gaining the business income and they are daily business expense. This expense meets the criteria of Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 for being regarded as allowable business deductions for income tax purpose. The issue raises the question regarding the determination of the input tax credit regarding the incurrence of advertisement expenses occurred under the GSTR Act 1999. The Goods and Service Taxation Ruling of GSTR 2006/3 lay down the guidelines concerning the procedures which can be applied arrive at the input tax credit and the administration of change that is put into the use by the financial supplies as per the new taxation system of GST Act 1999 (James 2016). An important contemplation to be noted in this context is that degree of creditable purpose and authentic employment of the ruling under division 11-15 and 129 of the GST Act 1999. The discussed GST Ruling is generally applicable for all the assessable entities that is registered or mandatorily necessary to get registered so that it can acquire the financial supplies which is beyond the prescribed limit of the financial acquisition and falls under the input tax credit or lowered input tax credit (Nethercott et al. 2016). The case of Big Bank evidently puts forward that the bank had a spending of $1,650,000, which additionally included the amount of the GST relating the advertisement that has been made, by the bank. The Goods and Service taxation ruling of GSTR 2006/3 is applied in the present situation of Big Bank Ltd as because the company shall be considered to be eligible for the input tax credit or lower input tax credits (Russell 2016). In agreement with the taxation rulings if it is found that the company is registered or it is required to obtain registration, GST will be payable in relation to the assessable supplies made. The system of GST lay down that the a taxable entity or the person can bring forward the claim of the input tax credit the supplies that are inclusive of GST that is obtained in the process of importation by the entity (Sadiq 2016). If an entity makes financial supplies and surpasses the threshold limit of the financial acquisition, such taxable entities will not be allowed to recover all the amount of GST that is charged to them but a portion of such GST can be recovered by the company (Kenny 2013). As it has been stated in the case of Ronpibon Tin NL v FC of T the principle of extent and to the extent is used to analyse the law of GST. This consists of the obligations in which the methodology of the allocation adopted should be fair and reasonable in relation to the specific enterprise (Krever 2013). Taking in the account the contemplation that is made in para 11-5 and 15-5 of the GSTR 2006/3 in order to make an acquisition entitled as creditable acquisition it should be noted that the financial supplies must be creditable solely or in fragments. Moreover there is additional compulsory necessities of para 11-5 and 15-5 that helps in determining an acquisition as the entitled creditable import, the acquisition is ought to be absolutely in the direction of creditable purpose (Woellner 2013). If it is found that the acquisition is partly for creditable reason than it is obligatory to establish the degree of creditable function. As it has been defined under the Section 11-15 or 15-10 an acquisition shall be eligible as creditable if the taxable entities claims input tax credits for the financial supplies made by it (Morgan, Mortimer and Pinto 2013). Big bank in context of present situation incurred an advertisement spending that was entirely dedicated for the creditable purpose. Big Bank has also surpassed the financial acquisition threshold limit and the bank in the present context can be regarded for the entailment of claiming input tax credit in conformity with the GSTR 2006/3 (Milton 2013). Conclusion: As apparent from the overhead conversation, the problem statement can be concluded by stating that Big Bank Ltd will be taken into the considerations for the entitlement of claiming input tax credit. Such input tax credit can be claimed in accordance with the GSTR 2006/13 for the sum that is incurred by Big Bank Ltd relating to the advertisement outlay sustained on creditable acquisition. Reference List: Grange, J., Jover-Ledesma, G. and Maydew, G. (n.d.).2014 principles of business taxation. James, M. (n.d.). 2015Taxation of small businesses. Jover-Ledesma, G. (2014).Principles of business taxation 2015. [Place of publication not identified]: Cch Incorporated. Kenny, P. (2013).Australian tax 2013. Chatswood, N.S.W.: LexisNexis Butterworths. Krever, R. (2013).Australian taxation law cases 2013. Pyrmont, N.S.W.: Thomson Reuters. Milton, Qld 2013. The taxpayers' guide. Wrightbooks. Morgan, A., Mortimer, C. and Pinto, D. (2013).A practical introduction to Australian taxation law. North Ryde [N.S.W.]: CCH Australia. Nethercott, L., Devos, K., Gonzaga, L. and Richardson, G. (2016).Australian taxation study manual. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Pyrmont, (2014). Australian Taxation Law Cases 2014. NSW: Thomson Reuters. ROBIN, H., 2017.AUSTRALIAN TAXATION LAW 2017. OXFORD University Press. Russell, T., 2016. Trust beneficiaries and exemptions from CGT: Reflections on the Oswal litigation.Taxation in Australia,51(6), p.296. Sadiq, K. (2016).Principles of Taxation Law 2016. Pyrmont: Law Book Co of Australasia. Snape, J. and De Souza, J., 2016.Environmental taxation law: policy, contexts and practice. Routledge. Tan, L.M., Braithwaite, V. and Reinhart, M., 2016. Why do small business taxpayers stay with their practitioners? Trust, competence and aggressive advice.International Small Business Journal,34(3), pp.329-344. The taxpayers' guide 2013 2014. (2013). Milton, Qld.: Wrightbooks. Tran-Nam, B. and Walpole, M., 2016. Tax disputes, litigation costs and access to tax justice.eJournal of Tax Research,14(2), p.319. Woellner, R. (2013).Australian taxation law select 2013. North Ryde, N.S.W.: CCH Australia. Woellner, R., Barkoczy, S., Murphy, S., Evans, C. and Pinto, D., 2016. Australian Taxation Law 2016.OUP Catalogue.

The Nanny Murder Case Essays - Louise Woodward Case, Woodward

The Nanny Murder Case Massachusetts v. Woodward Louise Woodward, a British Nanny, was hired in November of 1996 by Sunil and Deborah Eappen, for their sons, Matthew and Brendan. On February 4, 1997, the Massachusetts police received a phone call from Woodward stating that Matthew Eappen was having trouble breathing. When the paramedics examined Matthew, they said he had a 2-? inch skull fracture. His eyes were bulging, which is a sign of the ?shaken baby syndrome.? Before Matthew Eappens death, he spent four days on life support. After the event, Woodward was jailed without bond. Supporters from Massachusetts and Britain argued that she should not have to stay in jail on grounds that she is a foreigner and did not understand the U.S. legal system. She was kept in a states women's prison and had to stay because prosecutors felt that she might flee the country if she was freed on bail. Prosecutors said that Woodward admitted to harming Matthew. They said she shook him, dropped him on the floor, and then tossed him on the bed in order to quiet the baby. Prosecutors argued that Woodward was so frustrated with Matthews uncontrollable crying, that she began to violently shake him to stop the crying. Medical examiners said that Matthew must have hit the floor with the ?force equivalent to a fall from a second-story window.? Naturally the injuries from the fall along with the shaking caused Matthews death. Forensic expert, Barry Scheck, who took part in the O.J. Simpson trial, was recruited to help Woodward's defensive argument. The defense stated that a pre-existing medical condition might have killed Matthew, not the supposed mistreatment. The defense attempted to find genetic disorders that could have affected his bone strength and development or could have caused brain hemorrhages, by requesting DNA tests on Matthew. The defense also tried to put the blame on Matthews's two-year-old brother, Brendan, for the injuries, since he was the only other family member home that night. Prosecutors immediately argued that a boy of such a young age isn't capable of inflicting that serious of physical trauma on an infant. Louise Woodward was sentenced to death. After many appeals, and different attorneys, her defense argued that during the original trial, the defense was unable to have full access to the medical evidence that the state collected. Woodward was eventually acquitted and returned home to Britain. My personal opinion of the trial and the outcome is negative. I find that Louise Woodward not being imprisoned for her crime is ridiculous. It is obvious that she is responsible for Matthew Eappens death and Woodward's acquittal is absurd. If she can get away with such a horrible crime and be free to walk the streets, then I am sure there are people accused of equally severe crimes who have also been acquitted. Bibliography www.courttv.com Social Issues

Business Report of Apple and Samsung companies

Executive Summary There are notable impacts of globalization on the performance of companies. Evidently, there is need for adoption of more strategic measures. These are applicable within all business operations. Marketing, organizational leadership and collaborations are important.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Business Report of Apple and Samsung companies specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More These factors are eminent within this report. Apple and Samsung companies face these challenges. The companies are associated with the contemporary Samsung galaxy s3 and iPhone 4s.The companies have remarkable performance and development history (Murray-Webster Williams, 2010). They also have wide range of trade networks and product portfolio. They produce electronic gadgets that have diverse functional capacities. The report analyses the macro and micro-environmental forces that influence performance of these companies. T here are vital lessons drawn from the analysis of these two companies. Introduction This paper analyzes the Apple and Samsung companies. They are renowned global electronic producing corporations. In particular, Samsung Corporation manufactures TVs and mobile phones. Presently, it produces the modern Samsung galaxy s3. On the other hand, Apple Company produces the iPhone 4s. These corporations are notable global competitors. Their products are highly popular and acceptable within various global destinations. Indicatively, the two companies depict a high level of innovative technology (Palmer, 2004). This is notable from the period of their inception. The report examines various business factors influencing competition and success in these two companies. Various strategic tools of analysis are applicable in the process. These include the PESTEL and SWOT methodologies. Consequently, there is an analysis of the market strategies pertinent to each of these companies. The report also pro vides important recommendations. Industry Background Electronic industry has shown tremendous growth. This is due to the increased global demand for electronic products. Particularly, this applies for the smart phones and contemporary personal computers. Evidently, the increased demand for electronic items is surpassing supply. That is, there is low supply due to the diminishing supply of raw materials.Advertising Looking for report on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More These materials are crucial in the production of electronic items. This causes acute imbalances in supply of electronic gadgets and demand (Hitt, Ireland Hoskisson, 2011). As noted by researchers, electronic equipments play a fundamental role in transforming individuals’ lifestyle. This is because the items facilitate communication and execution of complex tasks. These require technological support. These items also enhance the develop ment of social engagement between individuals. There is need to initiate effective communication and social engagement programmes. Programmes should be set with an aim of facilitating social integration and monetary growth. The basic aim is to enhance individuals’ welfare. Indeed, there is untapped potential in the electronic industry. This is evident from the present imbalance between supply of effective electronic gadgets and demand. Aspiring investors must consider this gap. Currently, the renowned companies that operate in this field undergo a lot of strain (Murray-Webster Williams, 2010). These include the Samsung and Apple electronic corporations. They strive to serve the global populace with requisite electronic items of great functional capacity and quality. They have adopted conventional and viable marketing techniques. These initiatives aim at ensuring that the locals acquire the essential electronic items. Such items include the Samsung galaxy s3 and iPhone 4s. Th ese products have transformed basic global technological applications. This paper analyses the Apple and Samsung corporations. These are globally admired electronic manufacturing companies. Company Background Apple Company became operational in 1976. During this time, the core mission was to become the global â€Å"super† consumer product and be the leading distributor of electronic items. The company has immensely grown over the years since its inception in the US. Currently, it has several subsidiaries and business units. These are set to aid its product distribution to satisfy consumer needs (Apple, 2012). The company manufactures and supplies consumer electronic designs. These include computer software’s as well as the personal computers. The products are critical in improving communication and management in institutions.Advertising We will write a custom report sample on Business Report of Apple and Samsung companies specifically for you for only $1 6.05 $11/page Learn More The company’s production processes follow strict guidelines. There is an evident application of conventional techniques. These facilitate the quality aspect of the products. It is imperative to note that the company has risen from a small in-house business outsourcing institution to a renowned supplier of electronic items. This was achievable through its noble and development oriented strategies. The strategies have been instrumental in its growth through several ways. For instance, they provide the relevant operating framework with performance ideals (Apple, 2012). The company enjoys a wide market share and plans to expand further to new market segments. Samsung is a high-rank global business organization that produces electronic items. It produces Samsung galaxy s3 that conform to consumer specifications. In addition, this product contributes immensely to people’s advancement. This occurs both socially and economically. The com pany has had a record of good performance over the years. Particularly, it became the largest IT producer globally in 2009. This has facilitated its strong customer base. It has several assembly plants and sales subsidiaries that are in more than 61 countries. These provide it with a competitive advantage. The company’s growth is due to continuous implementation of transformational development plans (Samsung, 2012). Other products of Samsung are the laptops, electronic enhancers and phones. Product Overview Apple Corporation has a wide product range. These undergo processing and distribution for usage by consumers. The institution’s products are of great quality. They are suitable for use by various personalities. The products such as computer software, the iPhone 4s, as well as personal computers are presently common in the market. This explains their relevance in enhancing individuals’ communication and commercial dealings. Currently, the company has launched new products. These are more popular and acceptable in the market (Apple, 2012). The iPhone 4s products increase the company’s merchandise portfolio. The electronics are suitable for use by individuals of diverse age groups. The products offer the company a promising business environment.Advertising Looking for report on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Samsung enjoys a wider market share due to its quality products. The products are relevant and appealing to consumers. Samsung enjoys a considerable level of customer loyalty within most global destinations. The company has market dominance where it supplies TVs, computers and the most recent Samsung galaxy s3. Apart from its native products, the company has rolled out new LCD systems. These also include efficient smart phones. This is due to high customer demand for high value electronic products (Samsung, 2012). Strategic Marketing Strategic marketing is a systematic product awareness creation. In this process, corporations adopt different strategies for its competitors. The objective is to enable an optimal exploitation of strengths and market opportunities (Palmer, 2004). The process assists in the identification of viable competitive undertakings. Samsung and Apple companies should integrate their strategic marketing systems to advance their performance. The strategy would boos t customer awareness and effective distribution of products. Macro-Environmental Forces Macro-environmental forces are external factors that influence organizational performance. The forces influence decision-making. They are not controllable by the institutions. These forces include political, economic, social, technological, ecological and legal (PESTEL) factors (Palmer, 2004). Principally, political activities influence the stability and formulation of trade policies. Political instability destroys business operations and cause redundancies. Economic issues revolve around monetary complications. Finance is essential in driving business operations and leveraging price tags. Poor economic standards may hinder potential business growth. Social, technological, ecological and legal factors are also significant. The continuous technological changes affect institutional growth. These companies must develop evaluation techniques for the environmental factors. Micro-Environmental Forces M icro environmental forces are institutional or internal factors. They have direct influences on the institutions. Poor planning, resource misallocation, communication and marketing strategies can affect internal operations. Other forces include inferior market segmentation and technological support. These factors may delimit institutional growth (Hitt, Ireland Hoskisson, 2011). It is the responsibility of administrators in the diverse institutional setting to formulate viable operating policies. SWOT Analysis SWOT analysis is an assessment technique that is applicable in institutions. It facilitates the identification of the operating strengths and the evident gaps that may hinder exemplary performance. The main aim of executing SWOT analysis is to strengthen the institutional strengths. It also aims to design amicable solutions to the evident gaps within operations. The two companies have major strengths that have steered them to greater heights (Palmer, 2004). Apple Corporation h as strong product brands and qualified personnel. Apart from these, it has effective distribution channels, good infrastructural set up and expansive market share. Its weaknesses and threats include possibility of new entrance, limited network and diminishing raw materials. Samsung’s operating strengths include strong brand name, diversified revenue base, and ability to customize products to the locals (Techunicorn, 2012). Additionally, other strengths include research; focus on emerging economies and booming of the use of smart phones. These opportunities and strengths present the company with lucrative prospect. Its weaknesses and threats include compliance issues, macro-economic factors and the allegations of unethical business. The analysis enables an institution to understand its current position and design viable strategies for improvement and sustainability. Market Segmentation Market segmentation is the process of dividing the market into various categories. This enab les marketers to understand the specific needs of individuals in the diverse categories. Marketers are under obligation to identify the needs of various individuals. Parameters that drive market segmentation include age group, income levels, fashion and product identity (Hitt, Ireland Hoskisson, 2011). The parameters are critical since the needs of individuals in terms of product specification vary. Products used by the youth or children may not be appealing to the elderly. Market segmentation variables include geographical, gender, social and economic. The variables also influence institutional marketing activities. These companies have well defined market segments. The companies produce products that conform to the specific needs of the customers in various segments. Both companies segment their customers by age, economic capacity, geography, fashion and gender. Target Markets These are potential individuals with specific product needs. These needs may undergo gradual satisfactio n. They are individuals with high purchasing propensity. Therefore, corporations must recognize their requirements. Marketers must identify and target lucrative segments with potential buyers. Such initiatives ensure that the institution make supplies to target areas. These areas lead to high levels of sales revenues (Techunicorn, 2012). Ideally, attaining a breakeven operating capacity requires proper market identification and distribution of items. Samsung and Apple Corporations in their pursuit for exemplary performance should develop strong market identification guidelines. Targeting Strategy Targeting strategy is the process of identifying viable markets and potential customers. The basic aim is for the company to vend its products successfully. The strategy involves segmentation of the marketplace (Hitt, Ireland Hoskisson, 2011). This transpires through the identification of suitable sections of the market where supplies can take place. It also enables the identification of t he merchandise that is dispersible in each section of market appropriately. Positioning Strategy Position strategy appertains to how the company seeks to roll out its product portfolios. The strategy enables institutions to acquire full identity and attract consumer loyalty. Market positioning is a competitive strategy that institutions use to acquire an advantage over its rivals. This is evident since it enhances products’ dominance in certain markets (Hitt, Ireland Hoskisson, 2011). This is relative to other competitive items. Various factors influence the positioning strategies of institutions. The factors include the level of product demand, financial status of the locals in the area, prospective opportunities and the need to gain dominance. The strategy is relevant in the present competitive environment. The companies should adopt its ideals to steer their growth. Recommendations Marketing is an integral element. Institutions with growth prospects should develop strong marketing policies and formulate viable product distribution networks. Apple and Samsung corporations should perform detailed evaluation of micro and macro environmental forces. They should also develop strong strategic marketing guidelines and support systems. Strategic marketing involves adoption of unique marketing plans. The companies should evaluate and perform proper market segmentation. References Apple. (2012). Introducing Apple. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/ Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. Hoskisson, R. E. (2011). Strategic management: Competitiveness globalization. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. Murray-Webster, R. Williams, G. (2010). Management of risk: Guidance for practitioners. Norwich, England: The Stationery Office. Palmer, A. (2004). Introduction to Marketing: Theory and Practice.USA, Oxford University Press. Samsung. (2012). About samsung. Retrieved from https://www.samsung.com/pk/#latest-home Techunicorn (2012). Samsung Galaxy S3 exp ected to prove more popular than predecessor. Web. This report on Business Report of Apple and Samsung companies was written and submitted by user Kayson Garner to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

British Airways Essay Example

British Airways Essay Example British Airways Essay British Airways Essay Date| Event| Source| May 12, 2011| BA on the up after dispute dealBritish Airways has achieved a victory, albeit, at a considerable cost, that should stand it in good stead after cabin crew backed a deal to end the longest and most bitter dispute in the transport sector for years. Union had achieved an â€Å"honourable settlement† and pledged to work in a â€Å"spirit of partnership† to repair damage to the airline’s brand. Keith Williams, BA’s recently appointed chief executive, for being â€Å"strong, brave and courageous† in reaching the agreement. The settlement includes a two-year pay deal worth up to 7. per cent. It comprises an inflation-linked rise of up to 4 per cent this year, including 1. 1 per cent dependent on productivity savings, and 3. 5 per cent next, including 0. 5 per cent dependent on savings. The dispute started over cost-cutting but developed into a row over travel concessions removed from Unite members who went on strike, as w ell as suspensions and dismissals. The union was powerless to stop the original cause of the dispute – 1,700 full-time job losses among cabin crew as BA removed at least one crew member from most long-haul flights, saving ? 3m a year. It has also hired 700 new crew in its so called â€Å"mixed fleet† on certain routes, earning ? 17,000 a year on average compared with ? 29,000 for existing Heathrow cabin crew. That programme should yield ? 160m annual savings within a decade. â€Å"I think there is no question that it is a victory for British Airways but it comes at a cost,† said Douglas McNeill, at Charles Stanley Securities. Andrew Lobbenberg at RBS said â€Å"the economics of the dispute were won by BA about nine months ago† and it had gained â€Å"the credibility of being firm†. | Unread (Ft. om)Public View, Banks| May 12, 2011| Union welcomes BA deal that avoids humiliationUnion officials accused the company of â€Å"holding a gun† to th e heads of staff and in December that year, cabin crew announced a 12-day strike over Christmas after a 9-1 vote in favour of industrial action. High Court ruled that the strike could not go ahead because Unite had balloted hundreds of members who had subsequently left the company. March last year that the first three-day strike began after a second ballot. There were 22 days of strikes in total last spring, costing the airline an estimated ? 150m but BA managed to keep most of its customers flying. Some blamed Mr Walsh’s intransigence for prolonging the dispute but analysts praised him for preparing well. The airline had enough cash to fight a long battle and used a volunteer workforce, as well as aircraft hired from other airlines, to keep flights going. There was relief among Unite’s cabin crew members on Thursday that a formula had been found to end the dispute without more humiliation. An agreement come to reject by Bassa, Unite’s main cabin crew branch, this is due to the Mr Walsh said Unite had a â€Å"dysfunctional† relationship with Bassa, which operates largely autonomous. | Unread (Ft. om)Union views AND Cabin crew views| 14 May 2011 | BA workers vote to ballot on new dealOver 500 union members gathered for a mass meeting about the deal in West London today. Best summed up by one worker who said, The press and BA have damned us. But we have come out on top- they should say that. There will also be a pay increase totalling 7. 5 percent over two years- 4 percent this year, backdated, and 3. 5 percent next year. It is unclear whether there are productivity requirements attached. Management has also agreed that there will be no unilateral imposition of any new terms and conditions without full negotiations with the union. But a thread of uncertainty ran through the contributions from cabin crew during and after the meeting. Unite general secretary Len McCluskey told the meeting the sackings were nonsensical. But the agreement does not include the full reinstatement of the sacked staff. Mc Cluskey said, All it agrees to is binding arbitration. And those who have already been through an employment tribunal and are waiting for results,and dealt separately. McCluskeys only reference to this was to say, Change is with us. There is no point rejecting change, we have to embrace it. He also described a change within management psyche. It is no surprise that this psychobabble left crew feeling unsettled. McCluskey said the union would be making a strong recommendation that members accept it, and that he was very confident they would. Another expressed concern over the way in which the union was trying to push a deal on crew rather than allow an open discussion about pros and cons. Many asked how Bassa would su rvive when the mixed fleet remained and new starters were all employed on worse conditions. Nearly two years of a media witch-hunt and abuse from BA, it is no surprise that many cabin crew feel relieved to have a deal. Furthermore, Solidarity, something cabin crew have fought hard for, cannot be dropped now. Allowing BA to employ workers on worse terms will weaken the position of the union. According to the Bassa members, they are willing to fight in 5ballots as in But no deal should be agreed without the reinstatement of every sacked worker, and without the issue of new starters being resolved. Union said it will not call for more strike dates. | Unread ( Socialist Worker Online. A revolutionary anti-capitalist paper I Britain)Cabin crews view Union view | 12 May 2011 * | BA and union agree to end disputeBritish Airways and the Unite union have reached an agreement to settle their long-running industrial dispute. Unite general secretary Len McCluskey said, We always said that this dispute could only be settled by negotiation, not by confrontation or litigation. And so it h as proved, he said. I am particularly pleased that travel concessions will be restored. The union said BA had agreed to restore travel concessions to staff who went on strike and award a two-year pay deal worth up to 7. %. Under the pay deal, staff will get up to a 4% rise this year and 3. 5% next year. The awards are linked to proposed productivity changes, but the exact details are not known at this stage. BA said: On behalf of our customers, we are very pleased the threat of industrial action has been lifted and that we have reached a point where we can put this dispute behind us. Our agreement with Unite involves acknowledgement by the union that the cost-saving structural changes we have made in cabin crew operations are permanent. We have also agreed changes that will modernise our crew industrial relations and help ensure that this kind of dispute cannot occur again, the airline said. A recent change of leadership at both British Airways and Unite was seen to have given fresh impetus to a desire to reach agreement. Mr Duncan Holley, who was one of those sacked by the airline during the dispute, said the airline had taken some brave steps, and the union should match those brave steps. He said, a wind of change at BA under new chief executive, Keith Williams. The dispute began in 2009 over cost cutting but became bogged down over the loss of travel perks to striking staff and the dismissal of some employees who joined the industrial action. The strikes have resulted in travel chaos for hundreds of thousands of passengers and the bill for the disruption caused to BA has been estimated to be ? 150m. BAs years of industrial turbulence2009 * Oct 6: BA announces 1,700 cabin crew job cuts and pay freeze2010 * Mar 20: Start of 3-day strike, with dispute inflamed by BA decision to withdraw perks. * April: More strikes follow over the busy Easter period * May 17: BA wins injunction against further strikes after peace talks collapse * May 20: Unite wins appeal and strikes back on * May 22: Talks to avert walkouts end in disarray after demonstrators storm building, and chief executive Willie Walsh escorted away for protection * June: More strikes take total days lost to 22 * July 20: Cabin crew reject new offer * July 31: It emerges that more than 80 cabin crew have been suspended and 13 sacked because of incidents related to the dispute2011 * Jan 21: Cabin crew vote for fresh strikes, but action halted by new legal wrangling * Mar 28: Cabin crew vote by a ratio of 8-1 for strikes in new ballot * May 12: BA and Unite agree deal to avert further strikes| Unread (BBC news Business)Union viewsBA management viewsCabin crew views| 12 May 2011| BA and Unite reach deal to end cabin crew strikesUnion members to vote on settlement with British Airways that restores travel privileges and takes sac kings into arbitration. The deal is being put to a mass meeting of Unite members near Heathrow airport and is expected to be recommended for acceptance in a ballot. The deal will end 18 months of hostilities that included 22 days of walkouts. It includes the restoration of travel concessions for cabin crew, the issue that was holding up a settlement. McCluskey said: We always said that this dispute could only be settled by negotiation, not by confrontation or litigation. And so it has proved. We are delighted to have reached an agreement which I believe recognises the rights and dignity of cabin crew as well as the commercial requirements of the company. This agreement will allow us to go forward in partnership together to strengthen this great British company – good news for BA, its employees and its customers alike. I am particularly pleased that staff travel concessions will be restored in full with the signing of the agreement and the implementation of the new structure for working together that we have negotiated. A customer-oriented business can only succeed with all its employees valued and respected. A BA spokesman said: We have a lso agreed changes that will modernise our crew industrial relations and help ensure that this kind of dispute cannot occur again. Our agreement with Unite involves acknowledgement by the union that the cost-saving structural changes we have made in cabin crew operations are permanent. Two previous peace agreements were scrapped after Unite declined to recommend them because of concerns over sanctions against crew members who took part in strikes last year. It is understood the agreement restores staff travel perks stripped from thousands of crew who took part in the strikes, as well as allowing arbitration of the dozens of disciplinary cases – including sackings – that were linked to the dispute. BAs worst ever industrial relations dispute began in 2009 when the airline unilaterally reduced staffing levels on long-haul flights after a voluntary redundancy programme. Unite launched a strike ballot in protest at the cuts and the lack of consultation, triggering a year of high court hearings, strike votes and walkouts. In a bizarre interlude in the peace talks between Walsh and Woodley last year, members of the Socialist Workers party broke into discussions at the Acas conciliation service. | Unread (The guardian)Union ViewsBA management views| 2 May 2011| Unite to vote on deal to end BA disputeThe British Airways cabin crew union has voted almost unanimously to back a deal to end the longest and most bitter confrontation in the transport industry for years. Staff travel concessions, which had been removed from workers who went on strike last year, will be restored once the deal has finally been accepted. Disciplinary cases against dozens of Unite members arising from the dispute will be put to binding arbitration under the auspices of Acas, the conciliation service. The change in the leadership on each side gave fresh impetus to moves to resolve the dispute, leading to a fresh round of talks in recent weeks. For the first time, representatives of Bassa, a branch of the Transport ; General Worker’s Union, were involved. Mr McCluskey said: â€Å"There is a change within the management psyche at British Airways driven by the chief executive. If we embrace this we are confident that the future will look good. ’’ He said: the underlying reason had been a â€Å"deep sense of grievance† that cabin crew were not being respected. He was it was not a matter of winners or losers. But he told members they could be proud of showing â€Å"the type of union solidarity that is absolutely astounding†. | Unread (Ft. com)Union views| 11 May 2011| BA and Unite union move closer to ending cabin crew disputeAgreement comes after nearly 18 months of hostilities, including 22 days of walkouts, and will be debated by BA crew at Unite meeting near Heathrow airport. Bassa, Unites main cabin rew branch, said in email to members: The talks have now concluded to the satisfaction of both parties. If the branch agrees, the negotiated settlement will be put to the full membership in a postal ballot. Br itish Airways and the Unite trade union have taken a significant step towards ending a long-running dispute with cabin crew after agreeing a peace deal on Wednesday. | Unread (The guardian)Union views| 11 May 2011| BBC News BA strike: Hopes rise for end to cabin crew disputeThe long-running dispute between British Airways and some of its cabin crew may be close to being resolved. An offer will be put to a meeting of members at Heathrow on Thursday. If members endorse it with a show of hands, they will be formally balloted. A spokesman for Bassa, the British Airways cabin crew union which is a branch of the Unite union, confirmed that talks have now concluded to the satisfaction of both parties. Talks between the two sides have been going on for weeks. They began in March when cabin crew voted in favour of a further round of industrial action. The union held back from announcing dates pending negotiations. | Unread (BBC news Business)Union views| 27 April 2010| Reject BA offer, Unite urges crewThe union representing British Airways cabin crew has said it will strongly recommend that its members reject the latest offer from the airline. Talks between the two parties failed to reach agreement, so the Unite union will now ballot members on the offer. Unite said it would not announce strike dates at this stage. The blame for this rests exclusively with an intransigent management which is determined to attack trade unionism and persecute its employees who supported the strike action last month, said Unites j oint general secretary Tony Woodley. Mr Woodley accused BA of victimising cabin crew who had their travel perks taken away after the strike, and of taking vindictive and disproportionate disciplinary action against it members. BA said it was extremely disappointed that Unite was urging its members to reject our latest offer and apparently preparing for a further strike shortly after the general election campaign. The airline accused the union of showing callous disregard for passengers. It said the offer put to Unite was fair. BA can ill afford further disruption after seven days of strikes last month, which it says cost the airline up to ? 45m, and the disruption to flights caused by volcanic ash thrown into the atmosphere by an Icelandic volcano earlier this month. The airline is expected to announce the biggest loss in its privatised history when it reports its annual results later this year. Last year it lost more than ? 400m. | Unread (BBC news Business)Union viewsBA management views| 21 November 2010| Unite chooses McCluskey as leaderLen McCluskey has been elected leader of the UKs biggest trade union, Unite. His win, with 101,000 votes, will see him take over from joint general secretaries Tony Woodley and Derek Simpson who have been in post since the union formed in 2007. His win, with 101,000 votes, will see him take over from joint general secretaries Tony Woodley and Derek Simpson who have been in post since the union formed in 2007. He said: My first task now will be to bring our union together and unite it in a campaign against the devastation the Government is unleashing against working people and their communities throughout the land. He was closely involved with a dispute between British Airways and its cabin crew which resulted in a series of strikes. Also briefly some of the successful jobs experienced in his historical of life. He later became Unites assistant general secretary for industrial strategy. He has been a member of the Labour Party for 39 years. Unite has more than 1. 4m members and was formed by the merger between two of Britains leading unions, the Transport and General Workers Union and Amicus. | Unread (BBC news Business)Union views| 24 November 2010| Unite pledges alliance of resistanceLen McCluskey, the newly elected leader of Unite, Britains biggest trade union, today put himself and his union at the forefront of an alliance of resistance that he promised would rock the establishment and force the coalition government to step back from its plans to decimate the very fabric of the welfare state. He also claimed that an anger was building up in the country that surpassed the era of the poll tax demonstrations and claimed there was a very, very real possibility that the Liberal Democrats would implode as a party. In an interview with the Guardian he promised he would not be cowering in the corner, but instead would be shouting from the rooftops to force the coalition government to stop its cuts. He went on: I am not interested in subtlety. I understand what is happening to ordinary working people – their jobs are being lost, their families and the future of their children are being threatened, their houses are being repossessed and they are looking around for someone to give them help. There is an anger building up the likes of which we have not seen in our country since the poll tax. I can feel something stronger than that building so it is the responsibility of the trades unions more than anyone else to give some guidance to that anger and put it in a manner that will hopefully make the government take a step back. He insisted he would not be rushing ahead of his troops. We have got to make people believe that people power can do anything because that is what the history of our movement tells us and indeed that is what the history of the world tells us. Quotes the examples: [Nelson] Mandela may have taken that position over the laws of apartheid and [Mahatma] Gandhi may have taken that position over the laws of colonialism and imperialism, and the Suffragettes might have said we do not accept the law of the land. So I do not think we should get hung up in this belief certainly as trade union leaders that the law is given down from Mount Sinai and we cannot challenge it. . In addition, I have got no intention of playing the bosses game of being dragged into cul-de-sacs and courts, and having to be fined by courts with our members money. He is planning a series of conferences and tracking polls to check his memberships views. There are good people in the Liberal Democrats who have long been on the side of decency and justice. A lot of them are deeply dissatisfied, and if we build our resistance, and that may bring pressure to bear inside their party. The people we have to influence are the Liberal Democrats. We have got to start putting pressure on politicians particularly the Liberal Democrats; they have to be held accountable for what they have done there. They have tried to give the impression this would be a government of consensus but where is the consensus? | Unread (The guardian)Union view on protecting human rights| 4 March 2011| Unions hail court strike rulingTwo rail unions have welcomed a court ruling that prevents minor mistakes in balloting being used to halt strikes. Examples cases happening in two rail union. Trade union leaders called the ruling a major step for industrial freedom. Two strikes that were planned separately by the RMT on Londons Docklands Light Railway and by Aslef on London Midland were halted in the courts because of what were seen as technicalities. In the Aslef dispute, an overwhelming yes vote was set aside, because the employer objected to two ballot papers that had been sent to two members who were not entitled to take part. The court said in future that the information should be as accurate as was reasonably practicable and that allowances should be made for small accidental failures in administration. Richard Arthur, from the law firm Thompsons, who acted in the case, said the were a major victory for the union movement. Theres been a series of cases over the last 18 months to two years where employers have found it easier to get injunctions and the way the legislation has been interpreted by the courts has been ever more restrictive, he said. This case redresses that balance and interprets the legislation in the way its supposed to be interpreted. Keith Norman, Aslefs general secretary, said it had been almost impossible to take legal strike action in the UK. If the employer could find the tiniest discrepancy, the courts would find in the employers favour, he said. Bob Crow, leader of the RMT, called the result a massive victory and said it paved the way for millions of members to take action over cuts to jobs and services in the coming months. Unread (BBC news Business)Rails Union view Rails Union view| 28 January 2011| A tsunami of resistanceThe Trades Union Congress meets today to decide how it will respond to government spending cuts. Last September, it voted to organise co-ordinated resistance to these cuts. Since then, it has been educating its members and the public about the scale and detrimental impact of the cuts on public services and the economy at large. Now, it has to turn to the issue of mobilising opposition. It is organising what it hopes will be a massive demonstration on 26 March. And while t his will be an important barometer of whether there is support for resistance, the crucial issue is whether or not the unions can organise co-ordinated strike action – which is effective. Governments can ignore one-off demos but not action that stops services and the economy. What is co-ordinated strike action? It is unions organising separate industrial disputes so that workers in different parts of the public and private sectors strike together on the same day thereby creating a political punch at the government. The idea is the whole is greater than the sum of parts. If the strikes are not aggregated together, they will remain as just the odd strike here and there. Would this be lawful? The unions are not talking about a general strike. General strikes are unlawful as they are political strikes against a government and not an employer. But co-ordinated action would be lawful so long as each individual strike comprised a trade dispute with an employer and had a lawful mandate for action after going through the balloting and notification process. Thus, unions could not be sued for loss of business by employers. How could it happen? Despite the cuts being enforced by central government, their impact will take place at different times and with different effects in different parts of the public sector as individual employers take action to balance their books. This means it will be a difficult – though not impossible – task to synchronise all the groups of workers that want to take action. That is why unions may move first on pension reform, because this will affect a large number of workers at the same time and in the same way. Wont it seem that unions are just protecting their own vested interest? The downside of moving on pensions is that it is harder to portray this action as defending public services. If action was taken on redundancies, the argument could be made that reducing jobs also meant reducing service provision so that an alliance of service providers and users could be created. What about the wider anti-cuts movement? Unions have 7 million members and significant financial resources. But they will not win this battle on their own. They need to ally with others. But by the same token, others need to ally with them. Out of todays meeting needs to come a commitment by all unions to put their shoulder to the wheel to work effectively with campaigning organisations to create a tsunami of resistance. | Unread (The guardian)Explanation on the rightful legislation| 25 January 2011| BA strike: pilots union warns on safety and moraleThe leader of Britains largest pilot union has warned that the British Airways cabin crew dispute could endanger safety at the airline and has damaged trade unionism in the UK. Jim McAuslan, general secretary of the British Airline Pilots Association (Balpa), said the war within BA could endanger safety and urged the airline to act so that safety is not prejudiced. Last year a BA pilot told the Guardian that the dispute between the airline and the Unite trade union had created unsustainable working conditions on flights, due to the carrier using a volunteer workforce during strikes that included some pilots. He added, added that the aftermath of the cabin crew dispute could resemble the consequences of the miners strike in the mid-1980s, when communities were divided between strike-breakers and strikers. After all of this is over there will have to be a process by which everyone works together again. You cannot have what happened after the miners strike where there are still people in villages not talking to each other. Unite had become a prisoner of its main cabin crew branch, Bassa, McAuslan added. He also claimed that conciliation service Acas and the leader of the TUC, Brendan Barber, would agree with BAs argument that Unite and Bassa have a dysfunctional relationship. He said: I think Unite have become prisoners of a local branch that has lost the plot a bit If you speak to Acas and Brendan [Barber] they would probably agree that there is dysfunctionality within Unite. Unite argues that it has had no choice but to fight back against what it perceives to be a concerted union-breaking strategy at BA and believes that the dispute, originally over staffing cuts, would have been settled long ago if the airline was not determined to hobble Bassa. BA has consistently denied accusations of union breaking. McAuslan said Balpa supported the democracy of the latest Unite vote but indicated that pilots would not back the dispute. Last week nearly 80% of Unite-affiliated crew at BA voted in favour of strike action, although the union is holding off from setting walkout dates after calling for renewed negotiations with the airline. Responding to McAuslans comments on safety, a BA spokesman said: All of our crew are extremely professional and are trained to the very highest standards. The safety of our customers and crew is our highest priority and would never be compromised. | Unread (The guardian)Public views (Balpa)Union viewsBA management views| (BA-18)January 21, 2011/ 7:21pm| FT. om / Companies / UK companies BA cabin crew vote for more strikesBritish Airways is facing the threat of further strikes by its cabin crew after they voted heavily in favour of more walkouts, overshadowing completion of the airline’s merger with Spain’s Iberia. The Unite union said its members h ad voted by 5,751 to 1,579 to take further industrial action on a turnout of 75 per cent. It follows 22 days of strikes last spring which cost the airline more than ? 150m and prolongs a bitter dispute that has already lasted more than a year. The turnout among the union’s 10,220 members and the majority in favour of action of 78. 5 per cent were not far short of Unite’s two previous strike ballots. The union held back from naming strike dates and called for more negotiationsThe result was revealed as BA finalised its merger with Iberia to create a new holding company, International Consolidated Airlines Group. Shares in IAG will be listed in London and Madrid from Monday, with BA and Iberia retaining their brands in a link-up intended to save â‚ ¬400m (? 337m) a year within five years and pave the way for acquisitions. The airline has said if there are more strikes it expects to fly 100 per cent of long-haul and most short-haul flights at Heathrow, as well as full schedules at Gatwick and City airports. It kept most flights operating during the last bout of strikes by using volunteer staff and hiring extra aircraft and crew. Over the past 12 months, BA’s shares have gained 40 per cent and on Thursday closed at 283p. Len McCluskey, Unite’s new leader, said: â€Å"For the fourth time in 13 months, British Airways cabin crew have voted overwhelmingly in support of their union and expressed their dissatisfaction with management behaviour. † He added: â€Å"This dispute will be resolved by negotiation, not litigation or confrontation, and it is to negotiation that BA management should now apply itself†. The union is seeking immediate restoration of the concessions, binding arbitration for disciplinary cases and restoration of wages docked from staff who were sick during the strikes. BA said Unite did not have the support of the majority of cabin crew. â€Å"Of our 13,500 crew, only 43 per cent voted in favour of strike action in this ballot,† it said. | Unread (Ft. com)Union viewsBA management views| 21 January 2011| BA cabin crew vote for fresh strikesBritish Airways cabin crew have voted for further industrial action – but passengers were spared immediate disruption when the Unite trade union did not announce strike dates and called on BA to open negotiations. Len McCluskey, Unites general secretary designate, said BA management should wake up and listen, after nearly eight out of 10 crew members who took part in the ballot voted for strike action. Surely BA management must now wake up and listen to the voice of their skilled and dedicated employees. This dispute will be resolved by negotiation, not litigation or confrontation, and it is to negotiation that BA management should now apply itself. We are ready, he said. BA has pledged to operate 10 0% of its long-haul services in the event of any industrial action, having built up an auxiliary workforce of thousands of crew, including more than 500 retrained pilots. Those preparations have prompted Unite and its main cabin crew branch, Bassa, to delay announcing strike dates and plans for industrial action. BA cabin crew embarked on 22 days of strikes last year including walkouts in five-day blocks. Tactical discussions in recent weeks have looked at guerilla-style action though with no peace talks planned, conventional strikes have not been ruled out. Under trade union laws Unite must begin striking within 28 days, including seven days notice, which gives the union 21 days before it needs to announce dates. More than 10,000 crew members were balloted and 7,335 of them voted, representing a turnout of 75% in a poll over sanctions against crew who took part in strikes last year. A majority of 78. 5% voted for industrial action, a result described by McCluskey as overwhelming. The previous strike vote, in February last year, attracted a marginally higher turnout and majority. BA said the ballot result showed that Unite did not have the support of the majority of cabin crew, pointing to the fact that only 5,751 crew out of 13,500 flight attendants at BA voted in favour of industrial action. However, union sources said a more accurate comparison would be with the 10,220 crew who are actually Unite members. | Unread (The guardian)Union viewsBA management views| 21 Jan 2011| BA cabin crew vote for strikes now Unite should call actionBritish Airways cabin crew have voted by a fantastic 78. 5 percent for strikes on a 75 percent turnout. This is an even bigger vote than in the workers’ last ballot. Their Unite union must name the dates now and launch a militant programme of action that can win. BA bosses are waging war on cabin crew. Bullying boss Willie Walsh slashed jobs in November 2009. He has attacked pay, removed workers’ travel concessions and sacked leading union activists. BA’s ultimate aim is to destroy the union- that’s why this battle matters for the whole trade union movement. They’ve shown fantastic strength and determination throughout the dispute, taking 22 days of strikes and winning huge support from other workers. BA management have repeatedly shown themselves to be determined to break the militancy and organisation of cabin crew. It will be hard-hitting strikes that will make BA bosses listen. Crew should pile the pressure to demand that McCluskey calls a programme of strikes and throws the whole weight of the union behind the dispute. Unread ( Socialist Worker Online. (A revolutionary anti-capitalist paper I Britain)BA management views| 21 Mar 2010| Unite UnionThe Unite  trade union has urged  British Airways  to resume peace talks as cabin crews prepare to enter their third day of strike action with both sides clai ming to have landed blows in the disputeTony Woodley, called on BAs board to reopen negotiations over staffing cuts that broke up acrimoniously last week. BA is trying to restore a normal schedule when the strike ends at midnight tomorrow, but aircraft are now out of place around the globe, threatening more disruption, and a further four-day strike is due to begin on Saturday. I am now appealing to the BA chairman and sensible members of the board to use their influence, put passengers first and return to the negotiating table for the good of everyone, said Woodley. | Unite calls on BA to return to talks guardian. co. uk/business/2010/mar/21/ba-strike-unite-call-resume-negotiations| 24 Mar 2010| British AirwayBritish Airways has stripped striking cabin crew of their discounted travel perks as a further four-day strike looms this weekend. They would not be paid for the days they failed to turn up for duty, and confirming that, as warned, their access to the staff travel scheme will b e stopped from 14 April. A BA spokesperson added: Our cabin crew knew that if they took part in the strike they would lose their staff travel permanently. BA said yesterday that around 60% of its rostered cabin crew, or 3,000 employees, turned up for work over the three-day strike – implying that 2,000 joined the walkout in total. However, the Unite trade union, which is behind the dispute, has challenged those figures and claimed that they included staff on inbound long-haul services. 3,000 cabin crew turned up for work as normal during last weekends strike. BA employs around 13,500 flight attendants, of whom around 12,000 are Unite members. | Striking BA staff lose travel perks guardian. co. uk/business/2010/mar/24/british-airways-strike-travel| 25 Mar 2010  | British AirwayUnite had pledged to suspend a three-day strike last Saturday if the BA chief executive, Willie Walsh, reinstated a peace offer that had been withdrawn days before. His refusal to put the document back on the table, in apparent exasperation at the unions tactics, was highlighted in the academics letter, with 116 signatories. It is clear to us that the actions of the chief executive of British Airways, notwithstanding his protestations to the contrary, are explicable only by the desire to break the union which represents the cabin crew. Unites cabin crew branch, Bassa, represents 11,000 BA flight attendants and has called a further four-day strike starting on Saturday in what is now a prolonged industrial dispute with embarrassing political consequences for the Labour party, which relies on Unite as a major donor. British Airways trying to break Unite union guardian. co. uk/business/2010/mar/25/british-airways-accused-break-unite-union| 2 Apr 2010  | British AirwayAn article on the current cabin crew dispute between British Airway  and the Unite unions flight attendant branch Bassa, named Frank Burchill, a visiting professor at Strathclyde U niversity, as the author of what we described as a comprehensive guide to undermining Bassas current leadership. That information was incorrect. Professor Burchill was not commissioned to write, and did not produce or write this document. He had no involvement whatsoever in it. | BA told to hit union where it hurts guardian. co. k/theguardian/2010/apr/02/frank-burchill-apology| 28 Mar 2010  | Unite UnionUnited national officer, Steve Turner warned British Airways Passengers to expect further strikes after Easter unless there is a breakthrough in the bitter row over planned cuts that sparked further industrial action this weekend. Unite said it believed BA was grounding some flights so it could use pilots as cabin crew on other BA flights, a claim denied by the airline. | Unite warns disgraceful BA of more strikes guardian. co. uk/business/2010/mar/28/unite-british-airways-strike-threat| 29 Mar 2010  | Unite UnionUnited, is digging in for a battle of attrition with British Airway s after announcing that it is raising a ? 700,000 war chest for the cabin crew strikers. Unite is raising the fund through an unprecedented 2% levy on its 3,000 branches. The news came as BA confirmed that some cabin crew were being docked nearly a fortnights wages for taking part in the walkout, raising fears among Unite officials that union members will be starved into crossing picket lines if, as expected, the dispute drags on past Easter. The walkout, now in its sixth day, is adding to a long list of apparently irreconcilable issues between both sides. BA confirmed some strikers were being docked the equivalent of 12 days wages if they were rostered for a long-haul trip during the walkoutUnite, which is paying cabin crew ? 30 a day, has agreed to pay crew for the duration of their roster duty if they walked out on a long-haul shift. | Unite raises ? 700,000 for BA strike guardian. co. k/business/2010/mar/29/ba-cabin-crew-strike-fund| 10 Mar 2010  | British AirwayA walkout by 12,000 BA flight attendants could begin as soon as next Thursday. A source at Unites cabin crew branch, Bassa, said a walkout of at least 10 days would be consideredBA was s eriously considering a partial repeal of cuts to staffing levels on flights but wanted fewer crew back onboard than Unite has proposed. BA has been seeking ? 60m in annual cost savings from cabin crew. A strike could take place from next Thursday once Unite gives BA seven days notice of actionThe airline operates 650 flights a day with its 239-plane fleet, mostly from Heathrow, but has not said which routes would be kept open by the stand-in workforce. BA strike looms as talks break down guardian. co. uk/business/2010/mar/10/british-airways-strike-talks| 19 Mar 2010  | British AirwayThe dispute with cabin crew is about BAs plans to change working practices and pay. The first three-day strike is due to begin on Saturday, affecting over a thousand flights, with a second strike scheduled for 27 March. I believe Unite has made the wrong decision and misjudged the mood of our times, said British Airways chief executive Willie Walsh. My door remains open to Unite. The union is holding a rally for cabin crew staff at Sandown Park racecourse. | Last-ditch bid to end BA disputehttp://news. bbc. co. uk/2/hi/business/8574383. tm| 19 Mar 2010  | British AirwayBA threatened to suspend co-operation with Britains largest trade union after last-ditch talks failed to prevent a three-day strike by cabin crew starting today. Tonight an extensive strike-breaking plan moved into gear at BA as the airline prepared to move 65% of its passengers over the next three days with a workforce of 1,000 volunteer cabin crew and 22 chartered jets, including three Ryanair planes complete with no-frills flight attendants. BA cabin crew have also called a further, four-day strike from 27 March if there is still no agreement by the end of next week. The first BA cabin crew strike since 1997 begins tomorrow morning after talks between Willie Walsh, BA chief executive, and Tony Woodley, joint general ecretary of Unite, collapsed in acrimony this afternoon| British Airways declares war on union after talks fail guardian. co. uk/business/2010/mar/19/ba-strike-dates-union-talks| 25 Jan 2010  | Unite UnionBritish Airways  could be reduced to operating only a few flights during a cabin crew walkout after claims that its strike-breaking workforce has just 216 volunteers. The  Unite  trade union said that a programme to retrain employees as air stewards during industrial action would replace less than 2% of the airlines cabin crew. The recruitment initiative, which Unite has condemned as a scab labour drive, began yesterday as about 12,000 cabin crew started voting on a walkout over staff cuts. BA has told staff with no flying experience they can qualify as cabin crew within three weeks, with pilots able to meet safety standards within five days. The airline has admitted that the emphasis will be on safety rather than customer service, and temporary crew will give passengers a simple in-flight experience| Union claims BA has too few scabs guardian. co. uk/business/2010/jan/25/ba-strikebreakers-cabin-crew-protest| 22 Feb 2010  | British Airways The poll saw 81% of cabin crew backing strike action in  a row over staffing cuts and proposed changes to working conditions, on a turnout of 79%. The Unite union did not announce any strike dates, but a walkout can be staged within 28 days. A walkout by cabin crew is likely to ground most of BAs operations, although BA is training hundreds of auxiliary crew after calling for volunteers from its 38,000 workforce. BA operates 650 flights daily, carrying around 80,000 passengers. BA unilaterally reduced cabin crew on long-haul flights by at least one person to reduce costs at an airline that posted a pre-tax loss of ? 401m last year. | BA cabin crew vote to strike guardian. co. uk/business/2010/feb/22/ba-cabin-crew-vote-strike| ;BA -76;23 Feb 2010  | Cabin CrewBA has pursued a dual strategy of attempting to pile on the pressure to intimidate the cabin crew members into not voting to strike, on the one hand, and to undermine the effectiveness of any strike on the other. The anger BA staff feel is based on the unilateral imposition of the changes, the nature of the changes themselves and now the bully-boy tactics of company over the strike vote. | BA cabin crew stand up to intimidatory tactics | Gregor Gall guardian. co. uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/23/britishairways-tradeunions| 15 Mar 2010  | Cabin CrewIt is wrong that BA cabin crew get paid more than colleagues at other airlines. According to that argument, competition among staff means levelling down pay, while boardroom competition means levelling it up. And cabin crew bear no responsibility for BAs difficulties, and should not be singled out to pay for them. It was not cabin crew who organised the fuel price-fixing racket which has cost BA hundreds of millions in fines. The airlines reputation for dirty tricks? Not cabin crew but management. | Dont blame British Airways cabin crew | Len McCluskey guardian. co. uk/commentisfree/2010/mar/15/ba-strike-unite-willie-walsh| 17 Dec 2009| Cabin CrewThe high court has blocked  the 12-day Christmas walkout by British Airways cabin crew  after ruling that the strike ballot was illegal. The decision means nearly a million BA passengers can complete their journeys as planned over Christmas unless there are wildcat walkouts by the 12,700 cabin crew who supported industrial action. The dramatic intervention is a humiliation for the Unite union, which had considered delaying the announcement of a massive walkout earlier this week after receiving repeated warnings from BA executives that the vote was invalid. The high court confirmed those fears by granting BAs request for an injunction against the strike after around 900 cabin crew were balloted despite taking voluntary redundancy. | BA strike blocked by high court guardian. co. uk/business/2009/dec/17/court-blocks-british-airways-strike| 17 Dec 2009| British Airways The basic democratic right to withdraw own labour, underpinned by a 92% yes vote on an 80% turnout. In this case, theres not the slightest question that those mistakenly balloted half-way through taking redundancy could have changed the result. Instead, Mrs Justice Cox has made a transparently political decision to skew the balance of power still further in favour of BAs recklessly incompetent management. | BA strike judgment is blatantly political guardian. co. uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/17/ba-strike-injunction| 11 Nov 2010| Cabin CrewVote shelved as Unite unions cabin crew branch decides it cannot accept proposed deal to end strikeâ€Å"However, the Unite branch representing about 10,000 flight attendants, the British Airlines Stewards and Stewardesses Association (Bassa), made it clear it could not support the deal. The joint leader of Unite, Tony Woodley, said it made no sense to offer the deal to members over the heads of unwilling representatives. He added: Under these circumstances I have suspended the ballot on the offer and will meet with all of our cabin crew representatives as a matter of urgency to consider the next steps. | British Airways dispute continues as cabin crew ballot suspended guardian. co. uk/business/2010/nov/11/british-airways-cabin-crew-ballot-suspended| 11 Nov 2010| British AirwaysA plan to end a bitter, long-running dispute between British Airways and its cabin crew has collapsed. BA said the deal on offer was fair and reasonable. The airlines cabin crew workers have staged 22 days of strike action since March, costing the airline ? 150m. When the dispute began in November last year, it centred on changes to staffing levels, pay and working conditions. However, Unite has since said that the core issues are the removal of the travel concessions and the implementation of disciplinary sanctions against its members since March. BA reported earlier this month that its passenger numbers in September were 1. 3% higher than a year earlier. However, its total traffic for the year to date is still down on a year ago, following the strike action and Aprils volcanic ash cloud which grounded flights across Europe. | BA peace deal with crew collapses bbc. co. uk/news/business-11737454| 7 Nov 2010| British AirwaysAirlines security staff found to have photographed employees home and car as part of internal disciplinary caseBA security staff have photographed an employees home and car as part of one disciplinary case. One employee in the group, a former police detective, confirmed in a witness statement for a BA disciplinary hearing that he and a colleague travelled to a flight attendants house in Slough on 23 March this year and photographed their house and car. The crew dispute has led to at least 13 sackings and 60 suspensions, including senior shop stewards, for a range of alleged misdemeanours. The cases include 15 crew who used Facebook and private emails to discuss a list of strikebreakers and two shop stewards who were suspended following a clash over representing members in disciplinary cases. BA has drawn up a disciplinary process for cases associated with the industrial action. Guidelines for the Leiden room disciplinary unit, named after the room at BA headquarters where cases are processed, cite three types of transgresser in disciplinary incidents related to the strikes: bystanders, encouragers and contributors. | British Airways draw up new discipline rules as union prepares ballot guardian. co. uk/business/2010/nov/07/british-airways-disciplinary-rules-ballot| 31 Oct 2010| British AirwaysCabin crew to vote on British Airways latest offer with further strike action the only alternative to accepting the dealAbout 10,000 crew affiliated with the Unite trade union are preparing to vote on an offer that could finish a year-long row with the airline. Unites largest cabin crew branch, Bassa, said in an email to members that the only alternative to the deal was strike action. The BA offer sets out a framework for restoring staff travel to the estimated 6,700 crew who took part in 22 days of strike action this year, as well as allowing the Acas conciliation service to mediate disciplinary cases. | British Airways offer probably best available, says union guardian. co. uk/business/2010/oct/31/ba-offer-finds-union-favour| 24 Oct 2010| Unite UnionPoll could shift centre ground of trade union movementMembers of the countrys biggest trade union will begin voting tomorrow to choose a new leader in an election that could have profound consequences for the looming battle between the government and the nations workforce over its spending cuts. The winner will take over from Tony Woodley and Derek Simpson, who have been joint general secretaries since Unite was formed through a merger of the Transport and General Workers Union and Amicus in 2007. | Voting begins in crucial battle for Unite union leadership guardian. co. uk/politics/2010/oct/24/voting-begins-unite-union-leadership| 20 Oct 2010| Cabin CrewUnite union to poll around 10,000 flight attendantsAirline believed to have shifted on disciplinary actionSpeaking this week at the annual convention of the Association of British Travel Agents, Walsh said it was entirely Unites fault that a settlement had not been reached in a dispute that originated in a reduction of crew numbers on BA flights in the wake of a voluntary redundancy programme. Walsh said: In the past I have seen managers and businesses ignore issues and back down in the face of industrial action. We are not going to do that. Walsh added that BA had robust contingency plans and would operate 100% of its long-haul services if there were further strikes. | British Airways strike: crew vote on peace deal guardian. co. uk/business/2010/oct/20/british-airways-strike-crew-vote-deal| 20 Oct 2010| British AirwaysSources say Unite to put proposal to British Airways union members which could end year-long row over cost cuttingTony Woodley, joint leader of Unite, said yesterday that the BA row was the most testing industrial dispute of his career. Unite members took 22 days of strike action earlier this year, causing travel chaos for passengers and costing BA more than ? 150m. The dispute started just over a year ago after BA announced a series of cost-cutting moves, including a reduction in the number of cabin crew. As part of any deal to end the dispute, Unite has been urging BA to restore the travel concessions and stop taking disciplinary action. | BA staff to vote on deal to end strikes guardian. co. uk/business/2010/oct/20/ba-cabin-crew-vote-dispute| 20 Oct 2010| Unite ; British AirwaysBritish Airways cabin crews are to be balloted on a new deal that could end their long-running industrial dispute. The new offer was reached in talks between BA chief executive Willie Walsh and Unite joint leader Tony Woodley. The union has been pressing for the restoration of travel concessions removed from members who went on strike earlier in the year. BA said that its offer, based on its previous proposals, was very fair and reasonable. | BA crew face ballot on new deal bbc. co. uk/news/business-11582609 | 19 Sep 2010| Unite UnionThe Unite union will lodge an appeal in the high court this week over BA withdrawing travel concessions from 7,000 membersBA reduced crew numbers on long-haul flights from last November after the High Court in London refused an application from Unite for an injunction against the changes. Unite takes BA back to court | Politics | The Guardian guardian. co. uk/politics/2010/sep/19/unite-court-ba-airline-dispute | 10 Oct 2010| Unite ; British AirwaysUnion and BA boss Willie Walsh discuss proposals to end long-running dispute with airlines cabin crewUnite and its main c abin crew branch, Bassa, argue that the staff travel move is tantamount to punishment for exercising the right to strike. Walsh, in turn, has stated that the travel concessions are for those who show loyalty to the company. Walsh has pledged to operate 100% of BAs long-haul services from Heathrow in the event of further strikes, alongside a full complement of services at Gatwick and City airports. Walsh, a former shop steward himself, has dismissed the union-breaking claims as nonsense and pointed to a recent deal with Unite-affiliated customer services staff as proof that other sections of the organisation are willing to co-operate in cost-cutting plans. | British Airways and Unite meet at Acas to head off new strike | Business | The Observer guardian. co. uk/business/2010/oct/10/unite-talks-british-airways-cabin-crew | 11 Oct 2010| Unite ; British AirwaysWillie Walsh says the Unite union wants to bring the long-running dispute to an end, after the two sides met at Acas last week| BA chief raises hopes of peace deal guardian. co. k/business/2010/oct/11/ba-strike-airline-raises-hopes-peace | 27 June 2010| Unite UnionMove comes as BA manager claims dispute is driven by desire to break the union and that climate of fear pervades airlineWoodley warned today that he could not recommend the BA proposal to members because it did not fully reinstate the staff travel perks stripped fr om strikers who joined walkouts in March. The proposal makes some concessions – offering cabin crew a minimum allowance for food and drink, rather than a flat fee. However, it does not reverse the staffing cuts that triggered the dispute last year. Woodley indicated the offer would have been accepted had it reinstated staff travel. The fact that the travel is not back in full makes the possibility of a recommendation nil. It makes the certainty of a yes uncertain, he said. BA said: We believe our offer is fair and reasonable and provides a genuine opportunity to end this dispute. | Unite to delay BA cabin crew ballot guardian. co. k/politics/2010/jun/27/unite-union-ba-strike-ballot | 12 June 2010| ACASA new set of proposals to end the British Airways (BA) industrial dispute has been unveiled by the arbitration service Acas. | New proposals to end BA dispute bbc. co. uk/news/10301298 | 27 May 2010| European CourtRecent decisions by the European court of human rights may force the British government to protect strikers rightsPress reports suggest that a major sticking point to a settlement in the BA cabin crew dispute continues to be the companys refusal to restore staff travel perks. If true, this could (a) reveal an extraordinary lapse on the part of the company and (b) expose an extraordinary oversight on the part of the government in relation to its legal obligations. BA cabin crew may be able to seek compensation in Strasbourg for the losses they have suffered as a result of the companys conduct. This means that the taxpayer would end up having to pay for the companys actions. But second, it means that British law may have to be changed in line with the emerging body of case law to enable British workers to enforce their human rights in the British courts. Under British law, workers have protection only from dismissal (for 12 weeks) when they take part in lawful industrial action. They have no statutory protection against punitive and vindictive action short of dismissal, such as the cutting of benefits that are claimed to be noncontractual. | Will Europe save the BA strikers? | Keith Ewing guardian. co. k/commentisfree/2010/may/27/will-europe-save-ba-strikers | 18 May 2010| British AirwaysUnite has had to jump through so many hoops put in its way by lawmakers intent on restricting its democratic right to strikeBA won its injunction to stop the p lanned series of strikes that were due to start at one minute into Tuesday 18 May. Second time in six months that BA has gone to the high court seeking an injunction. Its not just that the judge sitting in the high court has taken BAs side on both occasions. And, its not just that Unite members have voted by large margins in two successive ballots to take strike action. Its also that BA won this injunction on a technicality. | BA victory is an affront to justice | Gregor Gall guardian. co. k/commentisfree/2010/may/18/ba-victory-affront-justice | 26 May 2010| Unite ; British AirwaysNew strike vote imminent before holding talks with BAs chief executive, Willie WalshIf BA fully reinstates the travel scheme for strikers, Unite has offered to suspend the three waves that started on Monday and are due to continue from May 30 to June 3 and June 5 -9, the last strike ending just days before the start of the World Cup in South Africa. BA said today that it hoped to run 70% of its long-haul s ervices from Heathrow next week, compared with 60% currently, because of the numbers of cabin crew reporting for work. Woodley believes the broad outline of a deal to lower costs has been thrashed out but Walsh wants guarantees that Unite and its main cabin crew branch Bassa will support the proposal if it is put to 11,000 flight attendants in a vote. | Unite and BA talks to resume on Friday guardian. co. uk/business/2010/may/26/unite-union-ba-strike-talks | Fri 21 Jan 2011| BA cabin crew vote for strikes now Unite should call actionBritish Airways cabin crew have voted by a fantastic 78. 5 percent for strikes on a 75 percent turnout. Bullying boss Willie Walsh slashed jobs in November 2009. He has attacked pay, removed workers’ travel concessions and sacked leading union activists. | SOCIALIST WORKER. COMCREW| Friday 21 January 2011| British Airways cabin crew plan new tactics for industrial actionBA passengers could be spared immediate disruption even if cabin crew vote for industrial action at the airline today. It’s understood that the Unite trade union will not announce lengthy walkouts if the result of a strike ballot, due this afternoon, returns a new mandate. BAs chief executive, Willie Walsh, has pledged to operate 100% of the airlines long-haul schedule at Heathrow, Gatwick and City airports, which would neutralise the effect of walkouts by staff. Union sources have acknowledged that the dispute has entered a different phase, with BA able to call on thousands of volunteer cabin crew, including more than 500 pilots who have retrained as flight attendants. | guardian. co. ukPUBLIC| Thursday 20 January 2011| British Airways strike: time to grow upBritish Airways cabin crew will announce the result of yet another ballot for strike action tomorrow. Most commentators seem to think that they will again vote in favour – but this time there will be fewer taking part in the ballot and possibly a smaller majority. For the sake of the passengers, shareholders and all the staff, both union and management must seek an adult end to this dispute. They must both realise that key workgroups cannot be both bullied and expected to deliver either loyalty or excellent customer service. They must both realise that the problem has not gone away with any of the solutions so far suggested – in reducing crew complements by one, it is not the cost of supplying the service which has been reduced, but the level of service itself. | guardian. co. kPUBLIC| Tue 11 Jan 2011 * | British Airways cabin crew hold defiant mass meeting 15Jan11 Socialist Worker1500 British Airways (BA) cabin crew packed into a union meeting at Kempton Park racecourse on Monday of this week. Cabin crew are currently balloting for fresh strikes over a range of attacks from their bosses. The ballot ends on Friday of next week. Workers haven’t struck since June in their ongoing dispute with bullying boss Willie Walsh. But they remain in fighting mood. Before any speeches began, crew were chanting, â€Å"Willie, Willie, Willie- Out, Out, Out! †| SOCIALIST WORKER. COMCREW | Thursday 17 December 2009| BA strike injunction could leave Walsh the winnerA bad day for democracy, said the Unite union after the high court blocked the planned 12-day strike by cabin crew at British Airways. | guardian. co. kMANAGEMENT| Friday, 18 December 2009| British Airways union Unite to call new strike voteBritish Airways (BA) cabin crew will be balloted again on industrial action after a planned Christmas strike was declared illegal by the High Court. The 12-day strike was called in protest over changes to working practices. But the judge agreed with BA that Unite had not correctly balloted its members, forcing it to cancel the action. The ballot included people who had left the company or were about to, and so was judged invalid. | BBC. CO. UKMANAGEMENT| Wednesday, 6 Jan 2010| British Airways to hold fresh talks with unionBritish Airways is to hold fresh talks with its main union in a bid to avert the renewed threat of strike action by cabin crew. Unite said it and the airline had agreed to meet in the coming days to try to find a negotiated settlement to the row over jobs, pay and conditions. The announcement comes after a High Court judge ordered Unite to call off a planned 12-day walkout over Christmas. This prompted Unite to say it would hold a fresh ballot on strike action. | BBC. CO. UKUNION| Tuesday 30 June 2009| British Airways fails to agree deal with unions on pay and conditionsBritish Airways has failed to meet its self-imposed deadline to secure an agreement on pay and conditions for its 40,000 staff after trade union officials adjourned talks on a two-year pay freeze and 4,000 redundancies. Both unions argue that the recession is a cyclical phenomenon that should not be used by BA as an opportunity to drive through permanent changes and a wholesale restructuring of the business. However, BAs pilots have already accepted Walshs warning and have signed up to a 2. 6% pay cut in an agreement that will save the airline ? 26m. | guardian. co. ukUNION | Tuesday 30 June 2009| British Airways seeks pay freezeBritish Airways wants staff to accept a two-year pay freeze, according to documents seen by the BBC. The company had already announced it was looking for 3,000 redundancies among crew and administrative staff. Talks between unions and management to agree on cost savings were adjourned earlier and should resume on Wednesday. BA is struggling as the economic downturn continues to hurt its business. It recently asked staff to work for nothing to save money. BA is also pushing for significant changes in working conditions. | BBC. CO. UKMANAGEMENT| Sunday 28 June 2009| Union resists prostituting agreements as BA pushes for pay dealLoss-making airline seeks redundancies and drastic changes to conditions but Unite is determined not to retreat too farWillie Walsh, BAs chief executive, has demanded an agreement by Tuesday after warning that there needs to be urgency around the discussions we are having. BA is making heavy losses, burning through cash at nearly ? 3m a day and posting ? 401m deficit last year. BA has told cabin crew that it wants up to 2,000 voluntary